|
課程名稱 |
進階職能治療理論
ADVANCED OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY THEORY |
|
開課學期 |
96-1 |
|
授課對象 |
醫學院 職能治療學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
林克忠 |
|
課號 |
OT7007 |
|
課程識別碼 |
429 M0090 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
必帶 |
|
上課時間 |
星期一1,2,3(8:10~11:10) |
|
上課地點 |
公職治422 |
|
備註 |
與羅鈞令、薛漪平、曾美惠、謝清麟、毛慧芬、張 彧、潘璦琬、吳錦喻、陳顥齡合開
限本系所學生(含輔系、雙修生)
總人數上限：20人 |
|
|
|
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
本課程的目的在於介紹當代職能治療相關的理論與相關研究，並由教師講演個別專長領域的理論基礎及研究應用現況，剖析職能治療理論與研發的新趨勢與學研對策，以充實學生之理論基礎，掌握未來研究所需之學理背景。 |
|
課程目標 |
培養研究生對專業領域之理論、學派、參考架構、模型之概念，為碩博班基礎的共同必修課程 |
|
課程要求 |
（1）課堂作業/報告80%，修課同學依理論領域選擇指導教師，由同學選定之指導老師安排期末書面報告，依教師要求繳交期末報告，由教師評分。期末書面報告由同學選定感興趣之理論，描述其主張、預測、操作工具與相關研究。文長 12 頁以內為原則（double space, 不含圖表與參考文獻）。
（2）課堂參與20%，由各授課老師評分。同學應預讀教師指定或發放之讀物，以利課堂討論。
（3）未經指導教師同意，期末報告逾期14天以上繳交者需重修。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 備註： 與指導教師另約時間 |
|
指定閱讀 |
|
|
參考書目 |
羅鈞令老師
1. Zemke, R. & Clark, F. (Eds.) (1996). Occupational science: The evolving discipline. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
2. Molineux, M. (2001). Occupation: The two sides of popularity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 48(2), 92-95.（蕭舜友，羅鈞令（翻譯）（2002）。職能：成為風潮後之兩面景況。職能治療學會雜誌，20, i-v。）
3. Clark, F., Wood, W., Larson, E. A. (1998). Occupational science: Occupational therapy's legacy for the 21st century. In M. E. Neistadt & E. B. Crepeau (Eds.). Willard & Spackman's occupational therapy (9th ed.) (pp. 13-21). Philadelphia: Lippincott.
4. Hasselkus, R. R. (2002). The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
（羅鈞令，蕭舜友（翻譯）（2004）。日常職能活動的意義。台北：合記書局）
5. Pierce D. E. (2003). Occupation by design-Building therapeutic power. Phildelphia, PA: F.A. Davis.
6. Jane A. D., Helene J. P. (2004). Occupational Development. In H. Charles, A. Elizabeth(Eds.), Introduction to Occupation - The Art and Science of Living (pp.91-119). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Charles C. (2004). Occupation and Identity: Becoming Who We Are Through What We Do. In H. Charles, A. Elizabeth (Eds.), Introduction to Occupation - The Art and Science of Living (pp.121-139). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
林克忠老師
1. Shumway-Cook, A. & Woollacott, M. H. (2007). Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice (3rd ed). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
2. Gazzaniga, M. S., Ivry, R. B., & Mangun, G. R. (2002). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
3. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2001). An introduction to brain and behavior. New York: Worth.
4. Blesdell Crepeau, E., & Boyt Schell, B. A. (2003). Theory and practice in occupational therapy. In E. Blesdell Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. Boyt Schell (eds), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (10th ed). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
潘璦琬老師
(Please read them before the class) (Please hand in a short essay within 7 days critiquing the model as the assignment for this session)
Model of Human Occupation:
1. Kielhofner G, Burke JP. (1980). A model of human occupation, part 1. Conceptual framework and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 572-581.
2. Kielhofner G. (1980). A model of human occupation, part 2. Ontogenesis from the perspective of temporal adaptation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 657-663.
3. Kielhofner G. (1980). A model of human occupation, Part 3, benign and vicious cycles. American Journal of Occupational Therapy , 34, 731-737.
4. Kielhofner G, Burke JP, Igi CH. (1980). A model of human occupation, Part 4. Assessment and intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 777-788.
5. Kielhofner, G.(2002)(3rd Ed.). The Model of Human Occupation. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins. Chapter 1~3.
毛慧芬老師
1. Shumway-cook, A. & Woollacott M.H. (2001) (2rd Ed.). Motor Control: Theory and practical applications. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
2. Corcos D.M. (1991). Strategies underlying the control of disordered movement. Physical Therapy, 71, 25-38.
3. Jarus T. (1994). Motor learning and occupational therapy: the organization of practice American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48, 810-.815.
謝清麟老師
1. Liddle, J., & McKenna, K. (2000). Quality of life: an overview of issues for use in occupational therapy outcome measurement. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal., 47(2), 77-85.
2. Wade, D. T. (2003). Outcome measures for clinical rehabilitation trials: impairment, function, quality of life, or value? American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(10 Suppl), S26-31.
3. Ware, J. E., Jr. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: comments on an evolving field. Archives Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84(4 Suppl 2), S43-51.
薛漪平老師
1. David B. Gray, PhD, Gerry E. Hendershot, PhD. (2000). The ICIDH-2: Developments for a New Era of Outcomes Research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil ., 81, S10-S14.
2. Hurst R. (2003). The international disability rights movement and the ICF. Disabil Rehabil., 25, 572-576.
3. International classification of functioning, disability and health. (2001). World Health Organization.
4. Marijke W, De Kleijn-de Vrankrijker. (2003). The long way from the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil ., 25, 561-564.
5. Stucki G, Ewert T. (2002). Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil ., 24, 932-938.
6. Schneidert M, Hurst R, Miller J. (2003). The role of environment in the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Disabil Rehabil., 25, 588-595.
張彧老師
TBA
曾美惠老師
1. Bundy, AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA, (2002)Sensory Integration: Theory and practice. 2nd ed..Philadelphia: FA Davis company.
2. Mulligan, S. (1998). Patterns of sensory integration dysfunction: A confirmatory factor analysis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(10), 819-828.
3. Lai, J. S., Fisher, A. G., Magalhaes, L. C., & Bundy, A. C. (1996). Construct validity of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Test. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 16(2), 75-97.
4. Mailloux, Z. (1990). An overview of the sensory integration and praxis tests. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(7), 589-594.
5. Varga, S., & Camilli, G. (1999) A meta-analysis of research on sensory integration intervention. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 189-198.
陳顥齡老師
1. Winter, D.A., Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005
2. Perry, J., Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, SLACK, 1992
3. Nordin, Margareta and Frankel Victor H, Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system, Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
4. Mow, V.C. and Hayes, W.C. Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, 2nd Edition, Lippincott-Raven, New York, 1997
5. Zatsiorsky, V.M., Kinematics of Human Motion, Human Kinetics, Leeds, 1998
6. Craik, R.L., and Oatis, C.A., Gait Analysis: Theory and Application, Mosby, 1995 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
課堂作業/報告 |
80% |
由指導教師評分 |
2. |
課堂參與 |
20% |
由各授課教師評分 |
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/17 |
課程簡介與職能治療理論 (3 hrs) |
|
第2週 |
9/24 |
中秋假期 |
|
第3週 |
10/01 |
職能科學 (3 hrs) |
|
第4週 |
10/08 |
職能發展與自我發展 (2 hrs)
職能治療卓越模式 (1 hr) |
|
第5週 |
10/15 |
職能治療之臨床與學術發展 (3 hrs) |
|
第6週 |
10/22 |
生活品質概念與評量 (1 hr)
動作控制理論 (2 hrs) |
|
第7週 |
10/29 |
動作學習理論 (3 hrs) |
|
第8週 |
11/05 |
行為神經科學與復健理論 (3 hrs) |
|
第9週 |
11/12 |
生物力學理論 (3 hrs) |
|
第10週 |
11/19 |
動作分析理論 (2 hrs)
感覺統合理論的新趨勢I (1 hrs) |
|
第11週 |
11/26 |
感覺統合理論的新趨勢II (3 hrs) |
|
第12週 |
12/03 |
感覺統合理論的新趨勢III (1 hrs)
人類職能模式：現今趨勢與研究I (2 hrs) |
|
第13週 |
12/10 |
人類職能模式：現今趨勢與研究II (3 hrs) |
|
第14週 |
12/17 |
職業重建與職能治療I (3 hrs) |
|
第15週 |
12/24 |
職業重建與職能治療II (1 hr)
弁鉬P健康之國際分類I (2 hrs) |
|
第16週 |
12/31 |
弁鉬P健康之國際分類II (3 hrs) |
|
第17週 |
1/07 |
綜合討論與課程總結 |
|